Several years ago I took a class from an expert in Second Temple Judaism who made this argument on the first day of class:
The biblical text is always reacting against a certain set of assumptions, beliefs, or presuppositions, so when interpreting any biblical text, you must always ask, “What is this reacting against in its context?”
I raised my hand and asked follow-up questions to make sure I understood the argument correctly.
I wasn’t convinced then, and I’m not convinced now.
Here’s what three other New Testament scholars have written about this:
1. Bob Stein
Robert H. Stein, A Basic Guide to Interpreting the Bible: Playing by the Rules (2nd ed.; Grand Rapids: Baker, 2011), 205–6:
The Danger of a Mirror Reading of the Epistles
It is immediately apparent in reading the Epistles that their occasional nature assists the reader in reconstructing the situation in life for which they were written. [Read more…] about Mirror Reading







