• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Andy Naselli

Thoughts on Theology

  • About
  • Publications
    • Endorsements
  • Audio/Video
  • Categories
    • Exegesis
    • Biblical Theology
    • Historical Theology
    • Systematic Theology
    • Practical Theology
    • Other
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Systematic Theology / Mark Dever Defends His Practice of Separation

Mark Dever Defends His Practice of Separation

June 15, 2008 by Andy Naselli

Mark Dever just posted this short article on the 9Marks blog: “Mark Dever doesn’t practice separation”?

He concludes:

To sum it up, I want my separation from the world to be more pronounced than my separation from other Christians.  Does this make sense?

Share:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: Systematic Theology Tagged With: fundamentalism, Mark Dever, Mark Minnick

The New Logos

Follow Me

  • X

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Todd Wood says

    June 15, 2008 at 6:32 pm

    I have never been to Dever’s church, but this is exactly the impression I got from the time I spent under the ministry of Minnick at MCBC.

    Don’t you think, Andy?

  2. Andy Naselli says

    June 15, 2008 at 10:02 pm

    Hey, Todd. I’m not sure that I understand what you are asking.

  3. Larry says

    June 16, 2008 at 6:34 am

    I understand his point, though I am not convinced it is universally applicable.

    In my thinking, at least the world isn’t sending mixed messages about the gospel, which is the point of separation for fellow believers who do.

    I wonder if that point should be developed more.

  4. Todd Wood says

    June 16, 2008 at 10:26 am

    Andy, when Dever writes,

    “To sum it up, I want my separation from the world to be more pronounced than my separation from other Christians.”

    This is exactly the impression I got from my time at MCBC.

    And I am wondering if you sensed the same?

    Lord bless,
    et

  5. Andy Naselli says

    June 16, 2008 at 10:36 am

    Thanks for the clarification, Todd. I think that’s probably the case, but it could use some qualification, e.g., “more pronounced” to whom?

    1. To all without distinction? Or to “compromised” Christians? Or to “uncompromised” Christians? I’m not sure that’s the case (though it may be the desire).
    2. To unbelievers? That’s probably the case.

    How “pronounced” such separation is will vary depending on one’s viewpoint.

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe via Email

God's Will and Making Decisions

How to Read a Book: Advice for Christian Readers

Predestination: An Introduction

Dictionary of the New Testament Use of the Old Testament

Tracing the Argument of 1 Corinthians: A Phrase Diagram

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1433580349/?tag=andynaselli-20

Tracing the Argument of Romans: A Phrase Diagram of the Greatest Letter Ever Written

The Serpent Slayer and the Scroll of Riddles: The Kambur Chronicles

The Serpent and the Serpent Slayer

40 Questions about Biblical Theology

1 Corinthians in Romans–Galatians (ESV Expository Commentary)

How Can I Love Church Members with Different Politics?

Three Views on Israel and the Church: Perspectives on Romans 9–11

That Little Voice in Your Head: Learning about Your Conscience

How to Understand and Apply the New Testament: Twelve Steps from Exegesis to Theology

No Quick Fix: Where Higher Life Theology Came From, What It Is, and Why It's Harmful

Conscience: What It Is, How to Train It, and Loving Those Who Differ

NIV Zondervan Study Bible

Perspectives on the Extent of the Atonement

From Typology to Doxology: Paul’s Use of Isaiah and Job in Romans 11:34–35

Four Views on the Spectrum of Evangelicalism

Let God and Let God? A Survey and Analysis of Keswick Theology

Introducing the New Testament: A Short Guide to Its History and Message

See more of my publications.

The New Logos

Copyright © 2025 · Infinity Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in