• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Andy Naselli

Thoughts on Theology

  • About
  • Publications
    • Endorsements
  • Audio/Video
  • Categories
    • Exegesis
    • Biblical Theology
    • Historical Theology
    • Systematic Theology
    • Practical Theology
    • Other
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Systematic Theology / Do the TGC Council Members Agree on the Creation-Evolution Issue?

Do the TGC Council Members Agree on the Creation-Evolution Issue?

April 4, 2011 by Andy Naselli

Andrew M. Davis, Creation (The Gospel Coalition Booklets; Wheaton: Crossway, 2011), p. 12 (numbering added):

The stakeholders of The Gospel Coalition are not on the same page with respect to all the details, but all of us insist

  1. that God alone is self-existing,
  2. that he is the creator of all,
  3. that he made everything good,
  4. that Adam and Eve were historical figures from whom the rest of the human race has sprung, and
  5. that the fundamental problem we face was introduced by human idolatry and rebellion and the curse they attracted.

The reasons for holding such matters to be nonnegotiable are bound up with many passages of Scripture, not just the opening chapters of Genesis. For example, Paul tells us that God “made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth” (Acts 17:26).

You can hear Andy Davis preach on Genesis 1–3 in his series on Genesis.

Share:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: Systematic Theology Tagged With: creation

The New Logos

Follow Me

  • X

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. JD Crowley says

    April 7, 2011 at 9:23 am

    Andy, does #4 require a direct creation of Adam and Eve? Or does it have room for pre-human evolution up to the point of Adam and Eve, with the assumption that all other pre-human branches never made it to the level of human?
    Thanks.

    • Andy Naselli says

      April 7, 2011 at 9:30 am

      The former. (Cf. Grudem, Systematic Theology, 278–79.)

  2. mike wittmer says

    April 6, 2012 at 11:22 am

    Does the statement that creation was originally good necessarily preclude human death before the Fall? Death before the Fall was the fourth concern that Keller raised in his white paper which he posted on Biologos, but it’s also the one point I don’t think he answered (unlike the first three). Did TGC omit the human death piece on purpose, or are they assuming this with a good creation?

  3. Andy Naselli says

    April 6, 2012 at 11:42 am

    Good questions, Mike. I don’t know.

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe via Email

God's Will and Making Decisions

How to Read a Book: Advice for Christian Readers

Predestination: An Introduction

Dictionary of the New Testament Use of the Old Testament

Tracing the Argument of 1 Corinthians: A Phrase Diagram

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1433580349/?tag=andynaselli-20

Tracing the Argument of Romans: A Phrase Diagram of the Greatest Letter Ever Written

The Serpent Slayer and the Scroll of Riddles: The Kambur Chronicles

The Serpent and the Serpent Slayer

40 Questions about Biblical Theology

1 Corinthians in Romans–Galatians (ESV Expository Commentary)

How Can I Love Church Members with Different Politics?

Three Views on Israel and the Church: Perspectives on Romans 9–11

That Little Voice in Your Head: Learning about Your Conscience

How to Understand and Apply the New Testament: Twelve Steps from Exegesis to Theology

No Quick Fix: Where Higher Life Theology Came From, What It Is, and Why It's Harmful

Conscience: What It Is, How to Train It, and Loving Those Who Differ

NIV Zondervan Study Bible

Perspectives on the Extent of the Atonement

From Typology to Doxology: Paul’s Use of Isaiah and Job in Romans 11:34–35

Four Views on the Spectrum of Evangelicalism

Let God and Let God? A Survey and Analysis of Keswick Theology

Introducing the New Testament: A Short Guide to Its History and Message

See more of my publications.

The New Logos

Copyright © 2025 · Infinity Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

 

Loading Comments...