• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Andy Naselli

Thoughts on Theology

  • About
  • Publications
    • Endorsements
  • Audio/Video
  • Categories
    • Exegesis
    • Biblical Theology
    • Historical Theology
    • Systematic Theology
    • Practical Theology
    • Other
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Historical Theology / 4 Reflections on Suetonius’s “The Twelve Caesars”

4 Reflections on Suetonius’s “The Twelve Caesars”

October 25, 2008 by Andy Naselli

Over the last  couple of days, I read The Twelve Caeasars (cf. Wikipedia) by Suetonius. I marked up my print copy while listening to a 13-hour audio book. It is a gossipy chronicle with a fascinating perspective on the lives of the first twelve Roman Caesars that significantly intersects with Second Temple Judaism and the birth and spread of Christianity:

  1. Julius Caesar (49-44 BC)
  2. Augustus (31 BC-AD 14): He was the emperor who issued the census when Jesus was born.
  3. Tiberius (AD 14-37): He was the emperor during Jesus’ ministry, death, and resurrection.
  4. Gaius Caligula (37-41)
  5. Cladius (41-54): He expelled the Jews from Rome, leading Aquila and Priscilla to move to Corinth (Acts 18:2).
  6. Nero (54-68): His rule breaks down into two parts: sane (54-62) and insane (62-68). Paul probably wrote his famous letter to the Christians at Rome in about 57 (including the exhortation in Romans 13:1-7 to submit to governing authorities). Nero apparently is responsible for the great fire of Rome in 64, which he then blamed on the Christians.
  7. Galba (six months in 68-69)
  8. Otho (four months in 69)
  9. Vitellius (69)
  10. Vespasian (69-79): He was laying siege to Jerusalem when he heard that Nero passed away, so he returned to Rome and left his son Titus to complete the conquest.
  11. Titus (79-81): He sacked Jerusalem in 70.
  12. Domitian (81-96): The book of Revelation likely responds to his severe persecution of Christians.
  • 1-6 = the Julio-Claudian dynasty
  • 7-9 = three minor emperors struggling for control during civil war
  • 10-12 = the Flavian dynasty

I won’t list all the places I noted interesting insights relevant for NT studies. Instead, here are four broader reflections:

1. Politics

Christians in the Roman Empire were under the authority of corrupt, immoral despots.

  • Many of the Roman Caesars illustrate the saying “Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Gaius Caligula, Nero, and Domitian in particular became inhumane monsters.
  • Many of the Roman Caesars were outrageously immoral with reference to sex (e.g., unconstrained fornication, adultery, homosexuality, incest, and worse), money (e.g., bribery, unjust taxation, false accusations to steal a rich person’s estate), and power (e.g., cruelty, extravagance, flattery, lies, massacres, assassinating even one’s family members, exposing newborn babies). Such behavior for the most part was culturally acceptable for them.
  • Many of the Roman Caesars were hypocrites. For example, Domitian’s immorality flatly contradicted the harshness with which he punished “unchastity.” In one instance, he ordered a guilty Vestal Virgin “to be buried alive, and had her lovers clubbed to death in the Comitium” (Domitian 8).

It is easy for modern Americans, for example, to overlook this when applying the NT’s teaching on the relationship between Christians and government. Christians, in my view, are right to be repulsed by the moral implications of an Obama presidency with reference to abortion, but it is also worth reflecting that their government could be far worse.

2. Manhood and Womanhood

Augustus instituted some stricter laws that encouraged marriage and large families (Augustus 34):

When he then discovered that bachelors were getting betrothed to little girls, which meant postponing the responsibilities of fatherhood, and that married men were frequently changing their wives, he dealt with these evasions of the law by shortening the permissible period between betrothal and marriage and by limiting the number of lawful divorces.

A perennial temptation for young bachelors is to selfishly postpone the family responsibilities that come with marriage.

In stark contrast to Christianity, the Caesars generally had a very low view of women, who had significantly less freedom and respect than men. Women, in turn, craftily used their feminine charm and sexuality in political power plays.

3. Dissatisfaction

The most powerful men in the world could not find ultimate satisfaction in anything. Some of the Caesars lived in constant fear of assassination. Others were constantly promoting themselves and blowing out the candles of everyone else so that their own candle would look brighter. For example, “Any good-looking man with a fine head of hair whom Gaius [Caligula, who was himself balding] ran across had the back of his scalp brutally shaved. . . . In short, however low anyone’s fortune or condition might be, Gaius always found some cause for envy” (Caligula 35).

4. Common Grace

The non-Christian (and some anti-Christian) Caesars nevertheless displayed some remarkable wisdom. For example, after some governors recommended a provincial tax increase, Tiberius replied, “A good shepherd shears his flock; he does not flay them” (Tiberius 32).

Share:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: Historical Theology Tagged With: politics

The New Logos

Follow Me

  • X

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Stephen Smith says

    November 3, 2008 at 9:25 pm

    Thanks, Andy, for taking the time to summarize and post your reflections on this book!

  2. Luma Simms says

    September 7, 2013 at 9:35 am

    Some years back I skimmed through this book reading only parts of it. The immorality was stomach turning. We Christians need a sobering reminder of what our forefathers in the faith suffered. Very nice summary, Andy.

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe via Email

God's Will and Making Decisions

How to Read a Book: Advice for Christian Readers

Predestination: An Introduction

Dictionary of the New Testament Use of the Old Testament

Tracing the Argument of 1 Corinthians: A Phrase Diagram

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1433580349/?tag=andynaselli-20

Tracing the Argument of Romans: A Phrase Diagram of the Greatest Letter Ever Written

The Serpent Slayer and the Scroll of Riddles: The Kambur Chronicles

The Serpent and the Serpent Slayer

40 Questions about Biblical Theology

1 Corinthians in Romans–Galatians (ESV Expository Commentary)

How Can I Love Church Members with Different Politics?

Three Views on Israel and the Church: Perspectives on Romans 9–11

That Little Voice in Your Head: Learning about Your Conscience

How to Understand and Apply the New Testament: Twelve Steps from Exegesis to Theology

No Quick Fix: Where Higher Life Theology Came From, What It Is, and Why It's Harmful

Conscience: What It Is, How to Train It, and Loving Those Who Differ

NIV Zondervan Study Bible

Perspectives on the Extent of the Atonement

From Typology to Doxology: Paul’s Use of Isaiah and Job in Romans 11:34–35

Four Views on the Spectrum of Evangelicalism

Let God and Let God? A Survey and Analysis of Keswick Theology

Introducing the New Testament: A Short Guide to Its History and Message

See more of my publications.

The New Logos

Copyright © 2025 · Infinity Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in