• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Andy Naselli

Thoughts on Theology

  • About
  • Publications
    • Endorsements
  • Audio/Video
  • Categories
    • Exegesis
    • Biblical Theology
    • Historical Theology
    • Systematic Theology
    • Practical Theology
    • Other
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Systematic Theology / Do Calvinists really believe in human responsibility?

Do Calvinists really believe in human responsibility?

November 3, 2008 by Andy Naselli

Justin Taylor’s gentle, respectful response to John Piper notes this:

(1) The fact that God ordains all things (i.e., his secret will) has a limited effect on our decision making. It can’t prescribe how we act, but it can prevent us from having the wrong perspective (e.g., anxiety, fear, despair, misplaced trust, etc.). But in terms of interpreting events, the main way to read providence is backwards (as John Flavel wrote: “Some providences, like Hebrew letters, must be read backward”).

(2) The fact that God ordains means ensures that our actions have significance. The ordained outcome can never be seen as an excuse for complacency or fatalism.

Calvinists believe in God-ordained means. This is not merely a platitude. John M. Frame says it well in Apologetics to the Glory of God: An Introduction (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 1994):

The relation of divine sovereignty to human responsibility is one of the great mysteries of the Christian faith. It is plain from Scripture in any case that both are real and that both are important. Calvinistic theology is known for its emphasis on divine sovereignty—for its view that God “works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will” (Eph. 1:11). But in Calvinism there is at least an equal emphasis upon human responsibility.

An equal emphasis? Many would not be willing to say that about Calvinism. . . . God’s sovereignty does not exclude, but engages, human responsibility. Indeed, it is God’s sovereignty that grants human responsibility, that gives freedom and significance to human choices and actions, that ordains an important human role within God’s plan for history (pp. 14-15, emphasis added).

Share:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: Systematic Theology Tagged With: Calvinism, John Frame, John Piper, Justin Taylor, sovereignty of God

The New Logos

Follow Me

  • X

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe via Email

What God Says in 1 Timothy

Tracing the Argument of 1 Timothy: A Phrase Diagram

How to Write a Paper: Five Steps to Writing a Theological or Literary Research Paper

Exegetical Fallacies

Tools to Study the Bible and Theology

Help! I Want to Be a Manly Man

God’s Will and Making Decisions

Predestination: An Introduction

How to Read a Book: Advice for Christian Readers

Tracing the Argument of 1 Corinthians: A Phrase Diagram

Dictionary of the New Testament Use of the Old Testament

Romans: A Concise Guide to the Greatest Letter Ever Written

Tracing the Argument of Romans: A Phrase Diagram of the Greatest Letter Ever Written

The Serpent Slayer and the Scroll of Riddles

How Can I Love Church Members with Different Politics?

The Serpent and the Serpent Slayer

40 Questions about Biblical Theology

Romans–Galatians

Three Views on Israel and the Church: Perspectives on Romans 9-11

That Little Voice in Your Head: Learning about Your Conscience

How to Understand and Apply the New Testament: Twelve Steps from Exegesis to Theology

No Quick Fix: Where Higher Life Theology Came From, What It Is, and Why It Is Harmful

Conscience: What It Is, How to Train It, and Loving Those Who Differ

Perspectives on the Extent of the Atonement: 3 Views

NIV Biblical Theology Study Bible

From Typology to Doxology: Paul’s Use of Isaiah and Job in Romans 11:34–35

Four Views on the Spectrum of Evangelicalism

Let Go and Let God? A Survey and Analysis of Keswick Theology

Collected Writings on Scripture

Introducing the New Testament: A Short Guide to Its History and Message

See more of my publications.

The New Logos

Copyright © 2026 · Infinity Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in