An introductory essay to IVP’s latest debate-book elaborates on five exegetical flash points in the justification debate:

1. Paul’s attitude toward Judaism
2. The role of works in final justification/judgment
3. Justification/righteousness in the Old Testament
4. Justifying righteousness: imputation, transformation or incorporation?
5. The meaning of pistis

—Paul Rhodes Eddy, James K. Beilby, and Steven E. Enderlein, “Justification in Contemporary Debate,” in Justification: Five Views (ed. James K. Beilby and Paul R. Eddy; Spectrum Multiview Books; Downers Grove: IVP, 2011), pp. 67–81:

Here are the book’s five views:

1. Michael S. Horton, traditional Reformed
2. Michael F. Bird, progressive Reformed
3. James D. G. Dunn, new perspective view
4. Veli-Matti Käkkäinen, deification
5. Gerald O’Collins, S.J. and Oliver P. Rafferty, Roman Catholic

Cf. Tom Schreiner’s review.