• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Andy Naselli

Thoughts on Theology

  • About
  • Publications
    • Endorsements
  • Audio/Video
  • Categories
    • Exegesis
    • Biblical Theology
    • Historical Theology
    • Systematic Theology
    • Practical Theology
    • Other
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Practical Theology / Why It’s Important to Understand Direct vs. Mitigated Speech

Why It’s Important to Understand Direct vs. Mitigated Speech

May 28, 2013 by Andy Naselli

plane-crashMitigated speech is communication that is deferential or indirect. I learned about it in Malcolm Gladwell’s book Outliers. Gladwell defines mitigation as “any attempt to downplay or sugarcoat the meaning of what is being said.”

It’s important to understand direct vs. mitigated speech because problems may result (1) if you don’t understand how others are communicating with you and/or (2) if you are not communicating clearly yourself. Extreme example: plane crashes.

A more normal result is frustration and relational conflict. Extreme example: a relational plane crash.

People who communicate more directly can often come across as harsh or too forceful to people who prefer mitigated speech.

Inversely, Gladwell explains that because a hint is the most mitigated form of speech, it’s “the hardest kind of request to decode and the easiest to refuse.” People who communicate with lots of hints often don’t communicate clearly to people who communicate more directly. And the problem compounds if (a) those who prefer mitigated speech are intimidated by those who use direct speech and/or (b) those who prefer mitigated speech really want those who use direct speech to like them and thus try not to say anything that might cause relational tension.

Some relationships could improve significantly if the people understood direct vs. mitigated speech. Consider marriage, for example: Can you imagine what would happen if a husband and wife grew up in families that communicated very differently in this regard? What if the husband consequently tends to communicate very directly and the wife indirectly? When two people communicate so differently, sometimes they misunderstand each other, which may result in unnecessary frustration or offense.

That’s why it’s important to understand direct vs. mitigated speech.

Related:

  1. Matt Perman, “Mitigated Speech and Plane Crashes.”
  2. Emotional Intelligence
  3. How Reliable Is Your Memory? 3 Practical Lessons
  4. It’s Not about the Nail: a hilarious short video (HT: Denny Burk)

Share:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: Practical Theology Tagged With: marriage

The New Logos

Follow Me

  • X

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. JD Crowley says

    May 28, 2013 at 6:16 am

    This is especially true when asking our children to do something. Often we’ll mitigate our speech like this, “Why don’t you …?” or “It would be great if you would ….” Young children often don’t understand that these are softened commands. Parents need to be clear in their instructions so that they aren’t responsible for their children’s “disobedience.”

    Missionaries come across as rude because we don’t know how our new culture mitigates speech.

    • Andy Naselli says

      May 28, 2013 at 6:27 am

      So wise, JD. Totally agree (though I don’t have anywhere close to the cross-cultural experience that you do re your final sentence).

  2. mike wittmer says

    May 28, 2013 at 2:59 pm

    What are you trying to say, Andy? C’mon, out with it!

  3. mike wittmer says

    May 28, 2013 at 3:05 pm

    Well, I just showed my wife the nail video. Can I sleep over at your place tonight?

Trackbacks

  1. Lessons for Leaders: Mitigated Speech - “Permission to Speak Sir?” - The Righttrack Blog says:
    June 10, 2013 at 3:40 am

    […] survived. In his book ‘Outliers’, Malcolm Gladwell uses this example to illustrate the dangers of what linguists call ‘mitigated speech’. He expailns the term ‘mitigated speech’ as: “refers to any attempt to downplay or […]

  2. For Goodness Sake, Say What You Mean…. | Blogournal says:
    January 8, 2014 at 10:17 am

    […] (mitigated speech) in his book, Outliers. Andy Naselli offers a few thoughts on the issue on his blog. You can follow the link to Andy’s discussion and see what he […]

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe via Email

God's Will and Making Decisions

How to Read a Book: Advice for Christian Readers

Predestination: An Introduction

Dictionary of the New Testament Use of the Old Testament

Tracing the Argument of 1 Corinthians: A Phrase Diagram

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1433580349/?tag=andynaselli-20

Tracing the Argument of Romans: A Phrase Diagram of the Greatest Letter Ever Written

The Serpent Slayer and the Scroll of Riddles: The Kambur Chronicles

The Serpent and the Serpent Slayer

40 Questions about Biblical Theology

1 Corinthians in Romans–Galatians (ESV Expository Commentary)

How Can I Love Church Members with Different Politics?

Three Views on Israel and the Church: Perspectives on Romans 9–11

That Little Voice in Your Head: Learning about Your Conscience

How to Understand and Apply the New Testament: Twelve Steps from Exegesis to Theology

No Quick Fix: Where Higher Life Theology Came From, What It Is, and Why It's Harmful

Conscience: What It Is, How to Train It, and Loving Those Who Differ

NIV Zondervan Study Bible

Perspectives on the Extent of the Atonement

From Typology to Doxology: Paul’s Use of Isaiah and Job in Romans 11:34–35

Four Views on the Spectrum of Evangelicalism

Let God and Let God? A Survey and Analysis of Keswick Theology

Introducing the New Testament: A Short Guide to Its History and Message

See more of my publications.

The New Logos

Copyright © 2025 · Infinity Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

 

Loading Comments...