Comments on: Review of Iain Murray’s “Evangelicalism Divided” http://andynaselli.com/theology/review-of-iain-murrays-evangelicalism-divided Thoughts on Exegetical, Biblical, Historical, Systematic, and Practical Theology Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:57:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Andy Naselli » Blog Archive » The Altar Call http://andynaselli.com/theology/review-of-iain-murrays-evangelicalism-divided/comment-page-1#comment-1240 Andy Naselli » Blog Archive » The Altar Call Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:23:14 +0000 http://andynaselli.com/theology/review-of-iain-murrays-evangelicalism-divided#comment-1240 [...] method and its role in the ecumenical movement over the last 50 years, read Iain Murray’s Evangelicalism Divided (Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth, 2000). If you are interested in the historical roots of the [...] [...] method and its role in the ecumenical movement over the last 50 years, read Iain Murray’s Evangelicalism Divided (Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth, 2000). If you are interested in the historical roots of the [...]

]]> By: SharperIron » Book Review—Evangelicalism Divided http://andynaselli.com/theology/review-of-iain-murrays-evangelicalism-divided/comment-page-1#comment-145 SharperIron » Book Review—Evangelicalism Divided Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:40:05 +0000 http://andynaselli.com/theology/review-of-iain-murrays-evangelicalism-divided#comment-145 [...] review was originally posted here with an annotated bibliography of other reviews of this title and interviews with Iain [...] [...] review was originally posted here with an annotated bibliography of other reviews of this title and interviews with Iain [...]

]]> By: David Bissett http://andynaselli.com/theology/review-of-iain-murrays-evangelicalism-divided/comment-page-1#comment-63 David Bissett Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:03:09 +0000 http://andynaselli.com/theology/review-of-iain-murrays-evangelicalism-divided#comment-63 Thank you for this summary and review -- and the various items you have attached. It is most useful. As a friend of Iain's (and an avid reader of his fine books) I think you are accurate and fair here. Men in ministry ought to read this book and accept its conclusions. Thank you for this summary and review — and the various items you have attached. It is most useful. As a friend of Iain’s (and an avid reader of his fine books) I think you are accurate and fair here. Men in ministry ought to read this book and accept its conclusions.

]]> By: Timmy Brister http://andynaselli.com/theology/review-of-iain-murrays-evangelicalism-divided/comment-page-1#comment-62 Timmy Brister Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:22:03 +0000 http://andynaselli.com/theology/review-of-iain-murrays-evangelicalism-divided#comment-62 Excellent review. Very thorough and careful. I appreciate the depth in which you mined and the breadth in which you researched. Thank you for this very helpful contribution. Excellent review. Very thorough and careful. I appreciate the depth in which you mined and the breadth in which you researched. Thank you for this very helpful contribution.

]]> By: Andy Naselli http://andynaselli.com/theology/review-of-iain-murrays-evangelicalism-divided/comment-page-1#comment-61 Andy Naselli Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:30:31 +0000 http://andynaselli.com/theology/review-of-iain-murrays-evangelicalism-divided#comment-61 Good question, Rod. What I intended to communicate with my concluding sentence is that I agree with Murray's overall thesis, and the bit you quoted is one way of summarizing his thesis. Good question, Rod. What I intended to communicate with my concluding sentence is that I agree with Murray’s overall thesis, and the bit you quoted is one way of summarizing his thesis.

]]> By: Greg M http://andynaselli.com/theology/review-of-iain-murrays-evangelicalism-divided/comment-page-1#comment-60 Greg M Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:15:01 +0000 http://andynaselli.com/theology/review-of-iain-murrays-evangelicalism-divided#comment-60 <p>Very helpful, Andy. I'm planning on reading the book.</p> Very helpful, Andy. I’m planning on reading the book.

]]> By: Rod Decker http://andynaselli.com/theology/review-of-iain-murrays-evangelicalism-divided/comment-page-1#comment-59 Rod Decker Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:49:58 +0000 http://andynaselli.com/theology/review-of-iain-murrays-evangelicalism-divided#comment-59 You conclude that "I think that Murray’s argument is convincing." Do your refer to your statement (early in the review) that "their strategy failed to fulfill what it promised but instead compromised the gospel itself"? Or to a fuller thesis of some sort? (I've not read the book, so can't determine that.) Thanks for the lengthy bibliog. of reviews--a lot of work and much appreciated. You conclude that “I think that Murray’s argument is convincing.” Do your refer to your statement (early in the review) that “their strategy failed to fulfill what it promised but instead compromised the gospel itself”? Or to a fuller thesis of some sort? (I’ve not read the book, so can’t determine that.)

Thanks for the lengthy bibliog. of reviews–a lot of work and much appreciated.

]]>