<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Piper: &#8220;Praise God for Fundamentalists&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andynaselli.com/theology/john-piper-praise-god-for-fundamentalists/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andynaselli.com/theology/john-piper-praise-god-for-fundamentalists</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Exegetical, Biblical, Historical, Systematic, and Practical Theology</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Aniol</title>
		<link>http://andynaselli.com/theology/john-piper-praise-god-for-fundamentalists#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Aniol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andynaselli.com/theology/john-piper-praise-god-for-fundamentalists#comment-462</guid>
		<description>It may also be helpful to highlight the related article that went with the resolution by the FBFI that had some high praise for Piper's contributions to biblical theology despite their concerns:

http://www.fbfi.org/content/view/48/24/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may also be helpful to highlight the related article that went with the resolution by the FBFI that had some high praise for Piper&#8217;s contributions to biblical theology despite their concerns:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fbfi.org/content/view/48/24/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fbfi.org/content/view/48/24/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
