Comments on: “Fundamentalist baggage” http://andynaselli.com/theology/fundamentalist-baggage Thoughts on Exegetical, Biblical, Historical, Systematic, and Practical Theology Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:57:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Andy Naselli http://andynaselli.com/theology/fundamentalist-baggage/comment-page-1#comment-1416 Andy Naselli Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:05:10 +0000 http://andynaselli.com/theology/?p=1199#comment-1416 1. Yes. 2. Yes and no. Answering such a question requires a lot of nuance. See, for example, Timothy George and John D. Woodbridge's "What’s in a Name: Are We All Fundamentalists?" in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/080248123X/?tag=andnassblo-20" rel="nofollow"><em>The Mark of Jesus: Loving in a Way the World Can See</em></a> (Chicago: Moody, 2005), 123–50, 182–83. This important chapter traces a significant etymological trajectory of the label “fundamentalist” and usefully overviews fundamentalism’s history. 1. Yes.

2. Yes and no. Answering such a question requires a lot of nuance. See, for example, Timothy George and John D. Woodbridge’s “What’s in a Name: Are We All Fundamentalists?” in The Mark of Jesus: Loving in a Way the World Can See (Chicago: Moody, 2005), 123–50, 182–83. This important chapter traces a significant etymological trajectory of the label “fundamentalist” and usefully overviews fundamentalism’s history.

]]> By: Chris Anderson http://andynaselli.com/theology/fundamentalist-baggage/comment-page-1#comment-1415 Chris Anderson Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:00:41 +0000 http://andynaselli.com/theology/?p=1199#comment-1415 Andy, Is Beale disagreeing with the growing contempt for the word <i>inerrancy</i>? Does he agree that it carries "fundamentalist baggage"? Also, do you think his (and Packer's) characterization of fundamentalism is accurate? Andy,

Is Beale disagreeing with the growing contempt for the word inerrancy? Does he agree that it carries “fundamentalist baggage”?

Also, do you think his (and Packer’s) characterization of fundamentalism is accurate?

]]> By: Dan Phillips http://andynaselli.com/theology/fundamentalist-baggage/comment-page-1#comment-1410 Dan Phillips Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:11:54 +0000 http://andynaselli.com/theology/?p=1199#comment-1410 Isn't that odd and sad? "Fundamentalist" as used today has almost no relation to its historical origins and usage. What was central to the word is ancillary; what was no part of the word is central. Isn’t that odd and sad? “Fundamentalist” as used today has almost no relation to its historical origins and usage. What was central to the word is ancillary; what was no part of the word is central.

]]>