Over the past month or so, I’ve read over 300 books and articles (often only parts of them) about the book of Job for a dissertation chapter I just drafted. Here are three of the most edifying and accessible resources:
1. D. A. Carson. “Job: Mystery and Faith.” Pages 135–57 in How Long, O Lord? Reflections on Suffering and Evil. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2006. [Amazon | WTS Books]
Penetrating insight, pastoral warmth.
2. Layton Talbert. Beyond Suffering: Discovering the Message of Job. Greenville, SC: Bob Jones University Press, 2007. [Amazon]
3. Derek Kidner. “The Book of Job: A World Well Managed?” and “Job in Academic Discussion.” Pages 56–89 in The Wisdom of Proverbs, Job, and Ecclesiastes: An Introduction to Wisdom Literature. Downers Grove: IVP, 1985. [Amazon | WTS Books]
There is a way of using theology and theological arguments that wounds rather than heals. This is not the fault of theology and theological arguments; it is the fault of the “miserable comforter” who fastens on an inappropriate fragment of truth, or whose timing is off, or whose attitude is condescending, or whose application is insensitive, or whose true theology is couched in such culture-laden clichés that they grate rather than comfort. In times of extraordinary stress and loss, I have sometimes received great encouragement and wisdom from other believers; I have also sometimes received extraordinary blows from them, without any recognition on their part that that was what they were delivering. Miserable comforters were they all.
Such experiences, of course, drive me to wonder when I have wrongly handled the Word and caused similar pain. It is not that there is never a place for administering the kind of scriptural admonition that rightly induces pain: justified discipline is godly (Heb. 12:5–11). The tragic fact, however, is that when we cause pain by our application of theology to someone else, we naturally assume the pain owes everything to the obtuseness of the other party. It may, it may—but at the very least we ought to examine ourselves, our attitudes, and our arguments very closely lest we simultaneously delude ourselves and oppress others.
I compiled lists of what to say and not to say to people who are suffering in an address on the logical and emotional problems of evil. Abbreviated forms of those two lists occur at the end of this four-page essay. Would you add anything to those lists?
This summer my church, CrossWay Community Church in Kenosha, Wisconsin, hosted a “Difficult Issues Series” on Wednesday nights, and on June 10 I addressed this topic: “Do We Have a Free Will?”
Here are a few examples of where I’d raise questions:
BAL: These are not things God planned or caused, they are, in light of Genesis 3, the result of man’s disobedience in the Garden. ADN: Is this a false disjunction? Doesn’t Scripture affirm both?
BAL: I am not saying that we may not learn valuable lessons in our suffering, but that does not mean that is why the suffering came to us. God may bless, but if He does, it is in spite of the suffering, not because of the suffering. ADN: Does this square with Jesus’ suffering on the cross?
BAL: We must ask the question: if God allows evil to bring about a good, is that good a necessary good? If it is a necessary good, then the evil that brings it is necessary and the only way it could be necessary is if God planned it. This makes God responsible for evil, something I think is clearly contrary to scripture because God is light and in Him is no darkness at all. If on the other hand the good is not necessary then we are back to asking the question why the evil?
ADN: Is this trying to relieve logical tension by over-qualifying or denying what Scripture says about God’s sovereignty? (See 3.6 here.)
This summer my church, CrossWay Community Church in Kenosha, Wisconsin, has hosted a “Difficult Issues Series” on Wednesday nights, and last night I addressed this topic: “How Could a Good God Allow Suffering and Evil? A Biblical Approach to the Logical and Emotional Problems of Evil” (MP3 | Handout PDF).
The MP3 is about 75 minutes long (and it doesn’t include the Q&A that followed), and the handout is 10 pages. I am especially indebted to Drs. Carson, Feinberg, Frame, and Piper. Here’s the outline:
1. Introduction
What is evil?
What are some examples of evil that are (almost) universally outrageous?
What is the problem of evil?
Why must Christians address the logical and emotional problems of evil?
What are some challenges to solving the logical and emotional problems of evil?
2. What are some unbiblical/inadequate solutions to the logical-intellectual-philosophical problem of evil?
Evil is not real.
God is not all-powerful.
This is the best possible world, and evil is necessary for its perfection.
Evil is a result of peoples’ free will, so God is not accountable for evil.
Evil is necessary for people to mature (i.e., build character).
God is the indirect (not direct) cause of evil, so He is not accountable for evil.
God is above the law, so He can do what seems evil to other people.
Non-Christians have no right to question whether God is both all-powerful and all-good.
3. What does a biblical approach to the logical-intellectual-philosophical problem of evil include?
Bad things do not happen to good people; good and bad things happen to bad people.
The problem of evil is an argument for God, not against Him.
God is not obligated to explain the problem of evil to anyone.
God (not our sense of justice) is the standard for what He does.
God ordains and causes evil, but He cannot be blamed for it.
The logical problem of evil (including providence) involves mystery, requiring that Christians maintain doctrinal tensions in biblical proportion.
God uses evil for a greater good.
There was no problem of evil before the fall, nor will there be one in the eternal state.
God uses natural evil to illustrate how bad moral evil really is, and the right response is repentance.
The most significant problem of evil is the cross.
4. What does a biblical approach to the emotional-religious-existential problem of evil include?
People who are suffering typically are wrestling primarily with the emotional problem of evil (not the logical one).
Understand how people initially react to suffering.
You shouldn’t say certain things to people who are suffering.
You should do certain things to people who are suffering.
5. Conclusion
6. Recommended Resources
Books [23 resources]
MP3s [8 resources]
The handout includes a more detailed outline, and the recommended resources section asterisks the most highly recommended resources, hyperlinks to every author and resource, and ranks the level of difficulty of each resource.