http://andynaselli.com/theology/carson-reviews-vanlandinghams-judgment-and-justification-in-early-judaism-and-the-apostle-paul Thoughts on Exegetical, Biblical, Historical, Systematic, and Practical Theology Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:06:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 http://andynaselli.com/theology/carson-reviews-vanlandinghams-judgment-and-justification-in-early-judaism-and-the-apostle-paul#comment-598 Dan Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:13:00 +0000 http://andynaselli.com/theology/carson-reviews-vanlandinghams-judgment-and-justification-in-early-judaism-and-the-apostle-paul#comment-598 <p>Carson makes a nice distinction between the two approaches. I followed the second approach and he's right, it has it's own set of problems. An interesting review with important points to consider. I had a good chuckle when I read this, "This is not exegesis; it is assertion of the desired conclusion on the basis of an unacknowledged preunderstanding regarding libertarian assumptions about how responsibility is grounded." Vintage Carson. I love his use of the language.</p> Carson makes a nice distinction between the two approaches. I followed the second approach and he’s right, it has it’s own set of problems. An interesting review with important points to consider. I had a good chuckle when I read this, “This is not exegesis; it is assertion of the desired conclusion on the basis of an unacknowledged preunderstanding regarding libertarian assumptions about how responsibility is grounded.” Vintage Carson. I love his use of the language.

]]>