<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rod Decker on Hebrews 7-10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andynaselli.com/rod-decker-on-hebrews-7-10/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andynaselli.com/rod-decker-on-hebrews-7-10</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Theology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:58:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GLWJohnson</title>
		<link>http://andynaselli.com/rod-decker-on-hebrews-7-10/comment-page-1#comment-2686</link>
		<dc:creator>GLWJohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andynaselli.com/?p=2611#comment-2686</guid>
		<description>DF
 Pardon my exasperation, but RD did made repeated references to non-dispensational scholars like F.F. Bruce and Philip Hughes- so why not with G.Vos who is rightly considered one of the most significant and seminal Biblical scholars of the 20th century? Vos contributions to the study of Biblical theology, especially as it pertains to the covenants-and even more importantly as to how this subject is developed in the book of Hebrews makes him indispensable dialogue partner for anyone seeking to understand the book of Hebrews. I would hope RD will address this omission in his future labors .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DF<br />
 Pardon my exasperation, but RD did made repeated references to non-dispensational scholars like F.F. Bruce and Philip Hughes- so why not with G.Vos who is rightly considered one of the most significant and seminal Biblical scholars of the 20th century? Vos contributions to the study of Biblical theology, especially as it pertains to the covenants-and even more importantly as to how this subject is developed in the book of Hebrews makes him indispensable dialogue partner for anyone seeking to understand the book of Hebrews. I would hope RD will address this omission in his future labors .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Fabricatore</title>
		<link>http://andynaselli.com/rod-decker-on-hebrews-7-10/comment-page-1#comment-2685</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Fabricatore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andynaselli.com/?p=2611#comment-2685</guid>
		<description>I am not sure the criticism of Rod Decker’s paper by Gary Johnson is valid for a couple of reasons. 

First, the Council on Dispensational Hermeneutics dealt with how current dispensationalists view the church’s relationship to the new covenant. Given the tight time constraints of the presentations (30 minutes), one can understand how the writings of Vos on Hebrews (published posthumously in 1952) might not make it into the paper. 

Second, Dr Decker did interact with the works of non-dispensationalists who comment on Hebrews as a quick glance of the extensive footnotes and bibliography will demonstrate. Many hope Dr Decker will write a full commentary on Hebrews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure the criticism of Rod Decker’s paper by Gary Johnson is valid for a couple of reasons. </p>
<p>First, the Council on Dispensational Hermeneutics dealt with how current dispensationalists view the church’s relationship to the new covenant. Given the tight time constraints of the presentations (30 minutes), one can understand how the writings of Vos on Hebrews (published posthumously in 1952) might not make it into the paper. </p>
<p>Second, Dr Decker did interact with the works of non-dispensationalists who comment on Hebrews as a quick glance of the extensive footnotes and bibliography will demonstrate. Many hope Dr Decker will write a full commentary on Hebrews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew  LaPine</title>
		<link>http://andynaselli.com/rod-decker-on-hebrews-7-10/comment-page-1#comment-2682</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew  LaPine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andynaselli.com/?p=2611#comment-2682</guid>
		<description>Is it my computer or is the file corrupted?  It wouldn&#039;t open for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it my computer or is the file corrupted?  It wouldn&#8217;t open for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GLWJohnson</title>
		<link>http://andynaselli.com/rod-decker-on-hebrews-7-10/comment-page-1#comment-2680</link>
		<dc:creator>GLWJohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andynaselli.com/?p=2611#comment-2680</guid>
		<description>How a conservative NT scholar could write a paper on this subject and not interact ( or even mention!) the extensive work of Geerhardus Vos on the book of Hebrews is extremely disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How a conservative NT scholar could write a paper on this subject and not interact ( or even mention!) the extensive work of Geerhardus Vos on the book of Hebrews is extremely disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Decker</title>
		<link>http://andynaselli.com/rod-decker-on-hebrews-7-10/comment-page-1#comment-2672</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Decker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andynaselli.com/?p=2611#comment-2672</guid>
		<description>Yes, there will be audio in due time. Maybe by next week, but the audio folks need to sort out the data files--we did record all sessions and the Q&amp;A (an hour of that per session)--and decide which and how much to post. There will be a link on my blog when it&#039;s available, along with the links to other papers, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, there will be audio in due time. Maybe by next week, but the audio folks need to sort out the data files&#8211;we did record all sessions and the Q&amp;A (an hour of that per session)&#8211;and decide which and how much to post. There will be a link on my blog when it&#8217;s available, along with the links to other papers, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Phillips</title>
		<link>http://andynaselli.com/rod-decker-on-hebrews-7-10/comment-page-1#comment-2670</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andynaselli.com/?p=2611#comment-2670</guid>
		<description>Oh, sweet! Thanks, Andy.

I wonder whether the audio of the presentations will be online?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, sweet! Thanks, Andy.</p>
<p>I wonder whether the audio of the presentations will be online?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
